Holland Releases Dubious MH-17 Report on Eve of Russia World Cup (by F. William Engdahl)

As a Dutchman, interested in geopolitics and thus also very interested in the research on the downing of flight MH-17, I would like to share with you a newsletter, written by F. William Engdahl, in which he shares his july 2014 article ‘Ukraine MH-17 is CIA False Flag and it Ain’t Flying‘.

You can find the original article via the author’s website and many other very interesting articles.

Why share it with you? Well, from the beginning I was and I still am convinced that the downing of MH-17 was a US/Kiev false flag backed by EU and NATO countries. Engdahl’s article confirms my opinion. I case you are not yet convinced I hope you will be after reading the article.
Why share it now? Well, check the title above (a dubious MH-17 report from Holland).

Note: some links at the end of the newsletter don’t work or don’t exist anymore. How can that be?

Here we go, F. William Engdahl’s newsletter dated 18.07.2018:

“Dear Readers,

For this issue of my newsletter I want to share something I wrote in July, 2014, shortly after a Malaysian airliner en route from Amsterdam to Malaysia was shot down over Ukraine. The piece is especially timely in light of the May 27 release of an investigative report in Holland alleging to have “definite” proof that the MH-17 airliner was shot down by a Russian BUK missile. That May, 2018 report presents no definitive new forensic evidence. Rather it relies on assertions and speculations by sources, including the UK-based Bellingcat, an intelligence operation receiving funds from among others, the NATO-linked Atlantic Council, where he is listed as “Nonresident Senior Fellow.”

In 2014 Bellingcat first engaged in assertions of Russian shooting of the MH-17 that were fraudulent and today would accurately be called fake news. Bellingcat’s Eliot Higgins posted a photo on July 14, 2014 under the headline, “Found: The Buk Missile Launcher That Downed Flight MH17.” Higgins wrote that the photo had been taken in the town of Snizhne. It was actually proven to have been taken in the town of Torez and under weather conditions significantly different to those on the day of the MH-17 crash. Higgins claimed it was unimportant when the photograph was taken or where…

Further, in the initial attempt to blame Moscow, on July 19 2014, Kiev’s Security Service (SBU) published photos online that it claimed showed ‘Russia’ secretly withdrawing a BUK-M surface-to-air missile system from the Ukraine civil war zone. At the time SBU Chief Vitaly Naida declared to press “The SBU … is getting clear evidence of Russian citizens’ involvement in the terrorist attack (on the Malaysian Airlines Boeing)”. However, bloggers immediately spotted the photos were of a Kiev air-defense system no. 312, previously pictured in March that year. With this background in mind, the latest attempt to reuse the badly discredited Bellingcat blog as investigative source for the latest attempt to again cast blame on Moscow, is highly revealing. With this in mind, I thought it worthwhile to reprint for you my initial investigation of the MH-17 affair written in July, 2014.


Censorship? One important note to all of you readers to underscore how the internet is being increasingly censored and critical websites or authors such as yours truly are coming under increasing attack. In March this year, 2018 I self-published via a subsidiary of Amazon, my newest book, Manifest Destiny: Democracy as Cognitive Dissonance. For the first two months, sales were building strongly. Then in early May just two hours after a major interview on the book on a very popular critical media in the US, I received an email, unsigned, from the Amazon publishing company announcing that my book had been delisted. Reason given was a vague claim the book contained information available for free on the internet and that their customers do not like to pay when they can get it free. They gave no prior notice or chance for me to defend against their charges. I replied, “Please explain what you refer to.” Reply was the same vague nonsense, again unsigned. I wrote again asking how we could clear this as soon as possible. Finally, after the book had been delisted for a week, they wrote “congratulations,” that I could reproof and upload it again. Since then sales have dropped dramatically despite favorable reviews. It is impossible to prove that Amazon’s company censored my book just when a burst of sales would be expected, but the case shows how vulnerable free speech has become and how real internet censorship is becoming.

I mention this incident to underscore how important it is to support independent critical voices especially now, and to ask you to consider buying the book if you have not done so, or making a support donation on my website, www.williamengdahl.com. I want to continue providing my work free of charge and not behind a paywall. To do that I need your support.

Thank you,

William Engdahl


Click the cover to buy the book on amazon:

Schermkopie-3399 2018.07.23

Ukraine MH-17 is CIA False Flag and It Ain’t Flying

By F. William Engdahl                                                                               26 July, 2014

The world has seen all this theatre before. We saw it with the false flag Gulf of Tonkin incident during the Vietnam War. We saw it with the CIA-Saudi faked Sarin gas episode in 2013 that brought the world to the brink of a world war. We saw it in the fake Niger uranium yellowcake episode that was used to bully a US Congress into war against Saddam Hussein’s Iraq in 2003—the so-called Weapons of Mass Destruction that never were found. Now the world is seeing it again in the frantic efforts of the US State Department and elements of the CIA to try to blame Putin’s Russia for allegedly giving the East Ukraine separatist rebels highly sophisticated Russian anti-aircraft weapons allegedly used to shoot down the Malaysian Airlines.

Putin, so charges Secretary of State John Kerry on five (!) US talk shows on July 20, is de facto guilty for not controlling the east Ukraine rebels. The proof of it all? “Social media,” according to the State Department official press spokesperson.   

The good news for those sober souls who are not eager to see a World War III pitting China-Russia and the BRICS against a US-led NATO and turning Westzern Europe into a devastated Trümmerfeld for the third time in a century, is that this attempt to blame Putin’s Russia is backfiring even as this is being written.

Unanswered questions

One of the most shocking features of western mainstream media coverage of the MH17 event is the utter lack of serious, cautious investigative journalism of the variety which used to exist only a few years ago. Rather than err on the side of caution before rushing to judgment in a situation that could easily trigger a new Cold War or worse, CNN, the New York Times, Washington Post, and most EU media including German simply quote Kiev government officials, even neo-nazi ones, as if they were credible. Real inquiry must look at the unanswered questions.

First we should begin with several very vital unanswered questions before making judgment what happened to MH17 Boeing 777 aircraft on July 17.

Number one is why Kiev Air Traffic Control, a part of the Ukraine Ministry of Aviation, ordered the MH17 to deviate from its scheduled route that avoided the war zone in eastern Ukraine? According to the initial reports of FlightAware.com which tracks all civilian aircraft online, on Thursday, July 17 Malaysian Airways Boeing 777 Flight MH17 from Amsterdam’s Schiphol Airport to Kuala Lampur Malaysia, deviated significantly in altitude and trajectory route from all other commercial flights which since outbreak of the civil war in eastern Ukraine in April have flown south of the conflict region. The key questions before giving blame to anyone, which have been completely ignored by the Ukrainian government in Kiev, by the Obama Administration in Washington, by most Western media are why did the pilot divert from his usual flight plan? Why did he fly above restricted airspace? And just what, if any instructions, did Kiev air control give the pilot in the minutes before the tragic explosion?  [1]

Source: screenshot images from FlightAware.com compiled by from Vagelis Karmiros who collated all the recent MH-17 flight paths as tracked by FlightAware and shows that while all ten most recent paths pass safely well south of the Donetsk region, and cross the zone above the Sea of Azov, it was only July 17 MH17 tragic flight that passed straight overhead Donetsk.

Curiously, after the FlightAware data was initially published, the site changed its version of the trajectory of MH17. Were they pressured to do so? If so, by whom? By NATO? By Washington? It’s implausible to imagine it could have been pressure from an isolated Russia.

Kiev’s fake ‘Smoking Gun’ Video

Most of Obama Administration arguments about who is responsible for MH17 rely on citing Kiev government officials as if they were credible. Yet they have lied repeatedly since their US-backed coup d’etat on February 22, 2014 brought them illegally into power at the barrel of a gun. Just hours after the news of the downing of the plane, Ukrainian Secret Intelligence released what it claimed was “proof” that MH17 was shot down by Russian-trained separatists under direct orders from Russia. The 2:23 minute YouTube purported to prove that “militants of “Bes” group using a Russian anti-aircraft missile shot down a Malaysian Airlines Boeing 777 passenger jet heading from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur.

Ukrainian intelligence presented what it alleged were recorded conversations, first of all between a pro-Russian separatist and his coordinator Vasyl Geranin, said to be a colonel of the Main Intelligence Directorate of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces. They talk about the “downing of a jet.” There is no distinction whether this is a civilian or a military jet, and may well refer to a shot down Ukrainian Su-25 which was shot down some hours earlier in the civil war fight. In the You Tube there is no way to prove the audio was not simply two actors in a studio reading a script given them by Kiev or CIA handlecredibility of Kiev officials who have lied about almost everything since day one. rs. The entire Kiev “smoking gun” You Tube vanished from the media when diligent IT researchers discovered the time/date stamp to the YouTube showing that the video was put online on 2014-07-16 at 19:10 pm Kiev time, a full day BEFORE the downing of MH17. Ooops! Back to the Langley drawing board, boys.

So much for the  credibility of the Kiev government, which has lied about pretty much everything since day one in office.

US NATO Maneuvers simultaneous

Now we come to a highly interesting coincidence. Just as was the case during the World Trade Center attacks of September, 2001 and the so-called Boston Bombers attack and numerous other terror incidences, there were relevant NATO-Ukraine maneuvers taking place just on the days before and right after the MH17 event.

According to Washington NSA “whistleblower” Wayne Madsen, NATO and the Ukraine military were making ten days of joint military “exercises,” code-named Sea Breeze,” that included the use of electronic warfare and electronic intelligence aircraft such as the Boeing EA-18G Growler and the Boeing E3 Sentry Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS). SEA BREEZE, according to Madsen, included the AEGIS-class guided missile cruiser USS Vela Gulf. From the Black Sea, “the Vela Gulf was able to track Malaysian Airlines MH 17 over the Black Sea as well as any missiles fired at the plane.” As well, US AWACS electronic intelligence (ELINT) aircraft were also flying over the Black Sea region at the time of the MH-17 fly-over of Ukraine. Growler aircraft have the capability to jam radar systems in all surface-to-air threats. [2]

The NATO exercise coincided with the July 17 MH17 downing only 40 miles from Russia’s border. “NATO ships and aircraft had the Donetsk and Luhansk regions under total radar and electronic surveillance.” [3]

(One very curious footnote is the recurring central role of Vice President Joe Biden in the Ukraine events. Biden has been personally involved since the beginning of the protests. And unusually, it was not NATO but the website operated by Vice President Joe Biden’s office that first announced US SEA BREEZE and RAPID TRIDENT II military maneuvers on May 21, 2014. As well, in a brazen conflict-of-interest, Biden’s son, Hunter Biden, is a newly-named director of the Ukrainian natural gas and oil company Burisma Holdings, Ltd., owned by IhorKolomoisky, the Ukrainian-Israeli mafia oligarch, whose is known as the «Chameleon»). [4]

The burning question is why has the US Government not released the exact tracking images for the flight MH-17 on July 17 to show precisely when it flew and from precisely where it was hit? Could it be they are afraid to reveal what they have for fear it would boomerang on Washington’s warhawks?

Not only do the US agencies have satellite data on the MH17 flight, they also have precise images of the likely rocket missile battery that fired the missile that destroyed MH17. And the images clearly show soldiers wearing….Ukrainian uniforms.

According to award-winning former Newsweek journalist Robert Parry, one reliable whistleblower source told Parry that, “US intelligence agencies do have detailed satellite images of the likely missile battery that launched the fateful missile, but the battery appears to have been under the control of Ukrainian government troops dressed in what look like Ukrainian uniforms.” [5]

Could this be the reason why even until today, the Obama Administration has not released detailed evidence to prove their assertions that Ukrainian “rebels backed by Moscow” fired the deadly rocket?  It would show in fact the opposite, that it was Kiev-tied forces.

US State Department changes story

The official propaganda war against Russia on the MH17 downing is being run, just as was the Maidan Square coup, by a cabal of neoconservatives in the US State Department around neoconservative Assistant Secretary Victoria “F**k the EU” Nuland, a former aide to Vice President Dick Cheney and former US Ambassador to NATO, whose neo-conservative husband Robert Kagan was one of the founders of the Bush-era war document, Project for a New American Century, that set out the plan for US war on Iraq in September 2000, a full year before September 11, 2001. [6]

Nuland’s Deputy Press Spokesperson, a former CIA press spokesperson, Marie Harf, in a July 21 Washington press briefing, faced unusually persistent and critical questions from several journalists. They asked why, if Secretary John Kerry and the US Government possessed “irrefutable” evidence of Russian and rebel involvement in MH17, did they refuse to make it public as they did in earlier instances such as the 1962 Cuba Missile Crisis.  Defensive and irritated by the questions, Harf retorted, referring to July 20 statements by Kerry, she declared, “our assessment that this was an SA-11 fired from Russian-backed, separatist-controlled territory.” But, incredibly, what was the proof the journalists were demanding? Harf replied, “that we know – we saw in social media afterwards, we saw videos, we saw photos of the pro-Russian separatists bragging about shooting down an aircraft…” [7] Excuse me, ladies and gentlemen for gasping. “We saw it in social media afterwards…we saw photos of pro-Russian separatists bragging…” Has the CIA developed talking photographs too?

Apparently feeling mounting pressure to produce some shred of evidence, a day later on July 22, CNN, a loyal mouthpiece for the US State Department, announced that the US Government had published satellite evidence. Finally! What was it? This drawing below, which any photo-paint novice could have made, showing nothing real or provable at all in any independent UN or other independent evidential inquiry:

Schermkopie-3400 2018.07.23As pressure built by the hour for the US Administration to release its reconnaissance photos as well, it began to look more and more that the “evidence” held by CIA satellite images indeed showed not pro-Russia rebels manning the BUK anti-aircraft in East Ukraine, but rather Ukrainian uniformed soldiers as Perry’s intelligence source maintained. Not good for the warhawk faction in Washington.

With Russian government and military intelligence releasing more of its own evidence, the Obama Administration has gone into a frantic “damage control” mode. At 5:57 pm Washington time on July 22, they decided to organize an anonymous press briefing by “unnamed senior officials.” “Unnamed senior officials” usually refers to very high level cabinet or assistant secretary level officials.

Several “unnamed senior US officials” held a press briefing in Washington. The US intelligence officials stated that while the Russians have been arming separatists in eastern Ukraine, “the US had no direct evidence that the missile used to shoot down the passenger jet came from Russia.” [8] This was new from Washington.

The US intelligence officials went on to say they didn’t know who fired the missile or whether any Russian operatives were present at the missile launch. They were “not certain” that the missile crew was trained in Russia…In terms of who fired the missile, they stated, “We don’t know a name, we don’t know a rank and we’re not even 100 percent sure of a nationality…” [9]

Looking like goofy characters in a bad remake of a Hollywood Laurel & Hardy film, the “senior” US intelligence officials, when asked for details on their evidence, repeated the State Department mantra of Marie Harf. The intelligence “seniors” had the chutzpah to state that they were, “relying in part on social media postings and videos made public in recent days by the Ukrainian government,” even though they openly admitted that they have not been able to authenticate all of it. For example, they cited a video of a missile launcher said to have been crossing the Russian border after the launch, appearing to be missing a missile. But later, under questioning, the officials acknowledged they had not yet verified that the video was exactly what it purported to be. [10]

That last bit of the press briefing is astonishing because it meant that some briefing officer, perhaps CIA or State Department, briefed the President of the United States (who presumably has little time to do his own investigations…) who then went on nationwide TV on July 21 to charge that the Malaysia Airlines plane, “was shot down over territory controlled by Russian-backed separatists in Ukraine.” He also said Russia has both trained the separatists and “armed them with military equipment and weapons, including anti-aircraft weapons.” That speech brought the entire world one giant step closer to an open Cold War with Russia that easily could become a hot war. A day later, somebody very senior inside the US Administration apparently decided to deescalate the confrontation massively.

Kolomoisky’s Private Army: Who did down MH17?

That begs the question of who did then down the MH17. Here the waters get very rough and very ugly. The specific area where the fatal missile was fired at MH17 is in fact not under control of the “pro-Russia rebels,” but under control of a neo-nazi private mercenary army, organized and armed by Ukrainian billionaire Ukrainian oligarch, Ihor Kolomoisky.

Kolomoisky stinks of being an asset of at least US and Israeli intelligence services. He holds both Ukraine and Israeli passports and operates his business empire from Switzerland, not Kiev. In the past months, Kolomoisky has raised his own mercenary army, complete with the BUK missiles allegedly used in the shootdown of MH-17. Kolomoisky, the Governor of Dnipropetrovsk oblast in eastern Ukraine, has threatened terrorist attacks against Russian-speaking officials in eastern Ukraine, including assassinations.

Kolomoisky, estimated to be the second-richest person in Ukraine, also has strong connections inside Kiev’s Borispol International Airport, where it has been reported that Ukrainian Interior Ministry troops stormed the air traffic control tower shortly before MH-17 was shot down.[11]

Was that storming of the Kiev Air Traffic Control Tower just before the MH17 strike done by Interior Ministry troops commanded and ordered by new Ukrainian Interior Minister Arsen Avakov—a man earlier wanted by Interpol for fraud and a staunch ally of former Prime Minister and Russia-hater, Yulia Tymoshenko and of Ihor Kolomoisky? Avakov first designated the east Ukraine rebels as “terrorists,” a label that ostensibly allows committing of any atrocity against innocent civilians very much as Israel in Gaza today. [12]

In a personal interview, Veterans Today Tbilisi Georgia bureau chief Jeffrey Silverman pointed to the possible complicity of the company Inmarsat in the MH17 case. Inmarsat, which lists the Pentagon and US Government as major clients, today has most international air traffic control communications systems under their purview. In the earlier disappearance of Malaysian MH-370, according to Silverman, the flight was “lost” due to Inmarsat turning off their signals and refusing until today to release their data. [13]

In an interview just after the downing of MH-17, a Spanish national identified only as “Carlos” told ETN, an online news service, that his private evaluation, and basing it on military sources in Kiev, was that the Ukrainian military was behind this shoot down. He said that Kiev radar records were immediately confiscated after it became clear a passenger jet was shot down and all foreign employees in the Traffic Control in Kiev were released immediately. Carlos also reported that the very same MH-17 plane was escorted by two Ukrainian fighter jets until 3 minutes before it disappeared from radar. [14]

We may never hear more details from Carlos as just after his report was posted in the internet, he disappeared, his social media accounts wiped and no one seems to know his whereabouts.

There are speculations rampant inside Ukraine that there is a deep split between the bitter and electorally defeated Tymoshenko and Chocolate King billionaire President Petyr Poroschenko, whose business empire depends to a large extent on economic ties with Russia.

Kolomoisky, nominally Jewish and ostensibly sympathetic to Israel or at least holding that passport, supports tactics of neo-nazis more reminiscent of Himmler’s SS or the Nazi Gestapo. Kolomoisky’s forces are armed with advanced weaponry, obtained both from Ukrainian weapons inventories and from purchases on the black market. They reportedly possess the BUK surface-to-air missile system said to have shot down the MH-17.

Kolomoisky’s forces comprise Ukrainian regular military personnel; neo-Nazi units from west Ukraine; foreign mercenaries, including Georgians, Romanians, and white supremacists from Sweden and Germany; ex-Israel Defense Force Blue Helmet commandos. They are organized into four battalions: the Azov Battalion; the Aidar Battalion, the Donbass Battalion; and the 2,000-strong Dniepr-1 (or Dnipro-1) Battalion, which was responsible for the deadly May 1 fire-bombing of the trade union building in Odessa and the burning alive of people trapped inside the Mariupol Police Station on May 9. Dnipro-1 also maintains a 20,000-member reserve force.

At the heart of Kolomoisky’s Army is a Nazi «Brownshirt»-style force of ardent Kolomoisky loyalists who have used guns, iron bars, and batons to seize control of factories and offices in Ukraine that Kolomoisky has expropriated from so-called «separatist» sympathizers.[15]

Georgian mercenaries in Kolomoisky’s Army have reportedly been trained in the use of BUK missile systems that an earlier Ukraine government of Viktor Yushchenko sold to then-Georgia Predisent, US-backed Mikheil Saakashvili. Kolomoisky has now used ex-President Saakashvili’s «consulting services» in Dnipropetrovsk in the military and political campaign against the breakaway people’s republics of Donetsk and Luhansk, according to Madsen.[16]

If the gang behind Kolomoisky was in fact behind the MH-17 disaster, it would explain why the neoconservatives and Israel lobby in Washington and around the world, especially in the media has so vehemently pointed the finger away from Kolmoisky and to Russia’s Putin. Kolomoisky apparently has indirect access to the highest levels of power within the Department of Defense, NATO, and the US Intelligence Community.

A serious truth-seeking investigation ought to start with Kolomoisky and his international network. But at this point it is clear the attempt to pin MH-17 on Putin’s Russia, a classic CIA “false flag” operation, an attempt to try to blame the enemy for what you have actually done, has badly backfired. This is however far from the last of it, it’s very clear to this writer.



[1] Marc Koutzarov, Why did it deviate the route which both KLM and MA where flying all week? Successive screen shots with time and dates from FlightAware.com, posted Friday, July 18, 2014, 9:06 am, accessed in http://discussions.flightaware.com/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=18919 also Tyler Durden, Was Flight MH17 Diverted Over Restricted Airspace?, ZeroHedge.com, 07/17/2014 23:55 -0400, accessed in https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/2014/07/restricted air space.png.

[2] Wayne Madsen, MH17 Beware of the “Chameleon”, Wayne Madsen Report, 21.07.2014, accessed in  http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/categories/20140512.

[3] Ibid.

[4] Ibid.

[5] Robert Parry, What Did US Spy Satellites See in Ukraine?, July 20, 2014, accessed in  http://consortiumnews.com/2014/07/20/what-did-us-spy-satellites-see-in-ukraine/.

[6] Wikipedia, Victoria Nuland, accessed in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victoria_Nuland.

[7] US State Department, Marie Harf, Deputy Spokesperson, Daily Press Briefing, July 21, 2014, accessed in http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/dpb/2014/07/229550.htm#UKRAINE.

[8] AP,  US: No link to Russian government in Flight MH17 downing, July 22 2014, 5:57 pm, http://www.aol.com/article/2014/07/22/us-no-link-to-russian-government-in-flight-mh17-downing/20935367/?icid=maing-grid7|main5|dl1|sec1_lnk2%26pLid%3D505510

[9] Ibid.

[10] Wayne Madsen, op. cit.

[11] Ibid.

[12]  Wikipedia, Arsen Avakov, accessed in  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arsen_Avakov_%28politician%29

[13] Personal email exchange with the author and Jeffrey Silverman, July 18, 2014. For information on Inmarsat, see the official company website at  http://www.inmarsat.com/about-us/

[14] ETN, Ukraine air traffic controller suggests Kiev military shot down passenger plane, July 17, 2014, accessed in http://www.eturbonews.com/48079/ukraine-air-traffic-controller-suggests-kiev-military-shot-down-

[15] Wayne Madsen, op. cit.

[16] Ibid.

Click the cover to buy the book on amazon:

Schermkopie-3399 2018.07.23
Strasse der Republik 17
Strasse der Republik 17
Wiesbaden Hessen 65203
Unsubscribe | Change Subscriber Options

Russia did it or was it ‘just’ another Western False Flag (English version)?

Schermkopie-3117 2018.03.28

This morning I saw Robert van der Roer at a Dutch TV news show WNL. He’s a Dutch diplomacy expert. No doubt you have guys like that in your country. Of course it was about Russia and Putin. For a moment I thought ‘I’m going to write a column like Jan Dijkgraaf (a Dutch professional buttkicker) often does, a letter from Niek to Robert’. I won’t do it that way. Jan always knows how to keep his columns short. Again I won’t be able to do that, although I will try to do it at this point in writing.

The reason to write this column is not Robert (he only triggered me) but a documentary I saw recently. A subject that I often talk about and which I also wrote about earlier. The reason to write about it again is the controversy about the poisoning of Mr. Skripal and his daughter by, as Theresa May proclaimed, ‘highly likely’ the Russians and so Putin.

I have read quite a bit about it on different websites (other than the MSM) and on my favorite website LewRockwell.com. On this site I read the following article: Four Days to Declare a Cold War. Because proof apparently no longer has any value in the West, I assume that it is highly likely that the Skripal case again is a Western false flag (here the definition and a list of 58 admitted false flags). The false flag described in the article is much more likely to me (and hopefully to you) than the lie of Theresa May.

Picture from my Tweet dated march 23

Why is that false flag much more likely? What has already been suggested by many, what is the importance of this attack for Putin and Russia? Who really does have an interest? You don’t know? Didn’t you read the article in which the 58 admitted false flags are described? Oh, you are not convinced yet?

Then it is time to go to the documentary that I mentioned at the beginning. Sit down and relax, it takes 1 hour and 42 minutes but it’s worth it and don’t be bothered by the title. Read instead of New World Order (Bush senior, Bill Clinton and Gorbachev talk about it in the docu) Globalization because that’s what it’s about. The long way to this Globalization is clearly explained in this docu. Especially the second part shows a lot about recent history. The documentary was published in October 2013, so the events of recent years (including the proxy war in Syria and the regime change in Ukraine) have not been incorporated. After seeing the docu you will hopefully be able to better understand these events and the current situation we are in (the further isolation of Russia and possibly further escalation).

After seeing this docu, the question remains, where are we going with the world? I see two scenarios, one more positive than the other:

  1. Russia and China oppose (I think rightly) against the globalization forced by the West.
  2. Russia and China play along with the ‘game’ towards the globalization desired by the ‘elite’.

In scenario 1, there seems to be some hope. I wrote about that earlier in my column A New World Awaits? English version. This scenario is disastrous for the West, especially the US. The US has built up a government debt of more than 20 trillion US$. The demise of the so-called PetroDollar means the downfall of the US and Europe. From this column the following quote about the PetroDollar:

‘Related to oil there’s yet another problem for the US, the PetroDollar (article in Dutch, video’s in English). This article also gives a good insight into the criminal role of the US in the world. Shortly summarized, oil can only be paid with US Dollars. With the rise of the BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa), the PetroDollar is increasingly under pressure because these countries (want to) pay oil in currencies other than the US Dollar. Renounce the PetroDollar, as Iraq, Libya and Syria wanted to do, you will regret that and pay a high price, especially small countries. A quote from the article about the PetroDollar:

According to many, there are forces in the United States who even want to start a third world war to maintain its power. Moreover, China, Iran and Russia don’t want the PetroDollar Debt anymore and work on a cautious dismantling of the PetroDollar. The problem is that there is a Debtbomb stuck on it. When the PetroDollar is bumped of her throne this will have unprecedented, enormous consequences for our financial system, particularly in the West. The US will therefore make every effort to maintain the PetroDollar, thus providing terrorism and the war industry further service. Again, the War on Terror and the PetroDollar are feeding each other

In scenario 2, the disaster will be even greater. Sometimes it’s called a ‘Global reset’. I also wrote (translated) the following document (longread) All Wars Are Well Planned Banker Wars, Including World War 3. Much of what is written in this article (dated may 2014, just after the US-orchestrated coup in Ukraine) is also mentioned in the documentary. From the article the following quote:

‘Since the terrorist attacks of Sept 11, 2001, world events, and in particular in the Middle East, show a growing unrest and instability between Modern Zionism and the Arabic World. This is completely in line with the call for a Third World War to be fought between the two, and their allies on both sides. This Third World War is still to come, and recent events show us that it is not far off.

World War 3 Timeline

These are, I believe, the stages of the planned Third World War:

  • Prelude – The events leading up to the start of World War Three, including Sept 11, 2001.
  • Act 1 – The Middle East. Widespread conflict to bring the entire region into the flames of war, possibly triggered by Iran or militants in Pakistan using North Korean supplied nuclear arms. The first Scene in this Act is the US Invasion of Iraq on March 20, 2003.
  • Act 2 – Israel at War — Against her Arab neighbors, possibly Palestine. A Palestinian State will be established, so that all Israelis will be fully separated from Palestinians (listen out for mention of a 7-year treaty to be confirmed by a World Leader – probably a Bush), only for Israel to viciously attack Palestine shortly thereafter.
  • Act 3 – Far East — “Hair-raising nuclear confrontation that threatens mankind’s existence” – Peter Lemesurier, author of The Armageddon Script, p. 223, written in 1981. Includes China invading Taiwan and a nuclear eruption on the Korean Peninsula.
  • Act 4 – Erosion of Confidence in ‘The System’ so severe citizens will be panicked into giving up liberties and Constitutional form of government. The plan calls for the dissolution of the US Constitution, triggered by a significant enough ‘terrorist’ attack.  The ultimate intent is to introduce a global government and one-world religion.
  • Act 5 – The collapse of the US, and other Western economies and morals.
  • Act 6 – Significant population reduction using natural and man-made disasters.
  • Curtain. Who can tell how this war will end?

Both Biblical prophecy and the Illuminati plan state that Israel is the key. The Third World War is planned to begin when Israel goes to war against her Arab enemies. Then, and only then, will all the other elements begin to occur and they will do so in rapid succession. The plan is to have one disaster following another in such rapid succession that, before people can mentally and emotionally handle one disastrous news event, they will be hit with another. It is also accurate to say that until ALL of the elements for WW3 are in place, the plan will not commence.

While it would be naive to suggest a specific timeline for the events leading up to and including World War 3, we do know that the plans for World War 3 are well advanced, and our leaders involved in this secret plan are waiting only for the right signal before all-out war begins’.

Which scenario it will be? I have no idea. Rather 1 than 2. That it will be one of those two is now almost certain for me. But is there no other, third scenario possible? Ultimately a successful globalization resulting in peace, well-being and prosperity for everyone? Looking at our ‘leaders’ and what is going on right now, I do not believe in it (Utopia). Do you?

In conclusion, I would like to return to Robert van der Roer, and also to other experts, journalists and politicians. What do they know what we don’t know or what do some of us know what they don’t seem to know?

To get that clear, or at least trying to do that, I use the following 4 (somewhat arbitrary, generalizing) categories (whoever fits the shoe……is that also an English saying?):

  1. People who don’t care about what’s going on in the world.
  2. People who follow and believe the MSM (people who can easily be influenced by mainstream newsstations and newspapers).
  3. People who are critical of the MSM, consult various alternative sources, know reasonably or very well what is really going on and oppose the plans of the ‘elite’.
  4. People who know reasonably or very well what is going on but who consciously keep the truth hidden (forced or unconstrained), go along with the MSM narrative or direct them in their reporting. By me a.k.a. ‘elite’ puppets.

It is often quite easy to determine who belong to the groups 1, 2 or 3. In case of group 4, I find that a little more difficult. Certainly, as far as I am concerned, our ‘leaders’ clearly belong to group 4. So, to which group do people like Robert van der Roer and other experts belong? And if you look at some journalists and politicians? And to yourself?

We can still ask Robert (and others), right?


Photo May and Trump via telegraph.co.uk
Photo Theresa May via NewStatesMan.com





Russia did it or was it ‘just’ another Western False Flag?

Schermkopie-3117 2018.03.28

Vanochtend zag ik Robert van der Roer weer bij WNL (voor de liefhebber vanaf 1 minuut 30), je weet wel die diplomatie deskundige. Het ging natuurlijk over Rusland en Poetin. Even dacht ik ‘ik ga een stukkie schrijven zoals Jan Dijkgraaf dat vaak doet, dus briefje van Niek’. Ik doe het toch maar niet op die manier. Jan weet het altijd zo lekker kort te houden. Dat gaat mij vast weer niet lukken al neem ik me op dit punt van schrijven voor dat wel te proberen.

De aanleiding om dit stuk te schrijven is niet Robert (hij triggerde mij slechts) maar een documentaire die ik onlangs heb gezien. Een onderwerp waar ik het wel vaker over heb en waar ik ook al eerder over schreef. De reden om er weer over te schrijven is dus de ophef rond de vergiftiging van meneer Skripal en zijn dochter door, zoals Theresa May dat verkondigde, ‘highly likely’ de Russen en dus Poetin.

Ik heb er inmiddels aardig wat over gelezen op verschillende websites (anders dan de MSM) en op mijn favoriete website LewRockwell.com. Op die site las ik o.a. het volgende artikel: Four Days to Declare a Cold War. Omdat bewijs blijkbaar geen enkele waarde meer heeft in het Westen ga ik er vanuit dat het highly likely is dat het in de zaak Skripal alweer om een Westerse false flag gaat (hier de definitie en een lijst van 58 toegegeven false flags). De false flag die in het artikel wordt omschreven is voor mij (en hopelijk voor u) vele malen aannemelijker dan de leugen van Theresa May.

Plaatje uit mijn Tweet van 23 maart

Waarom die false flag veel aannemelijker is? Wat door velen al is aangedragen, wat is het belang van deze aanslag voor Poetin en Rusland? Wie heeft er dan wel belang bij? U weet het niet? Heeft u het artikel waarin de 58 toegegeven false flags worden beschreven dan nog niet gelezen? O, u bent nog niet overtuigd?

Dan wordt het nu tijd om naar de documentaire te gaan die ik in het begin noemde. Ga er maar goed voor zitten, duurt 1 uur en 42 minuten maar dan heb je ook wat en laat je niet hinderen door de titel. Lees i.p.v. New World Order (Bush senior, Bill Clinton en Gorbatsjov hebben het daarover in de docu) maar Globalisering want daar gaat het over. De lange weg daar naar toe wordt in deze docu helder uit de doeken gedaan. Vooral het tweede deel laat veel zien over de recente geschiedenis. De docu is gepubliceerd in oktober 2013 dus de gebeurtenissen van de afgelopen jaren (w.o. de proxy oorlog in Syrië en de regime change in Oekraïne) zijn er niet in verwerkt. Na het zien van de docu zult u ook die gebeurtenissen en de huidige situatie (het verder isoleren van Rusland en mogelijk verdere escalatie) hopelijk beter kunnen plaatsen.

Na het zien van deze docu blijft wat mij betreft de vraag, waar gaat het heen met de wereld? Ik zie twee scenario’s, de één iets positiever dan de ander:

  1. Rusland en China verzetten zich (m.i. terecht) tegen de door het Westen opgedrongen globalisering.
  2. Rusland en China spelen het ‘spel’ mee op weg naar de door de ‘elite’ gewenste globalisering.

In geval van scenario 1 lijkt er nog wat hoop te zijn. Ik schreef daar eerder over in mijn stuk A New World Awaits? Dit scenario is voor het Westen, met name de VS, desastreus. De VS heeft inmiddels een staatsschuld van meer dan 20 triljoen US$ opgebouwd. De ondergang van de z.g. PetroDollar betekent de ondergang van de VS en Europa. Uit dit stuk hierover het volgende citaat:

‘Gerelateerd aan olie speelt er voor de VS nog een ander probleem, de PetroDollar (ook dit artikel geeft een prima inzicht in de criminele rol van de VS in de wereld). Kort door de bocht gezegd, olie kan alleen worden betaald met US Dollars. Met de opkomst van de BRICS landen (Brazilië, Rusland, India, China en Zuid-Afrika (South Africa) komt de PetroDollar meer en meer onder druk te staan omdat die landen olie (willen) betalen met andere valuta dan de Dollar. Afstand doen van de PetroDollar, zoals Irak, Libië en Syrië dat wilde doen, komt je, zeker als klein land, duur te staan. Een citaat uit het artikel over de PetroDollar:

Volgens velen zijn er krachten in de Verenigde Staten die het tot een Derde Wereldoorlog willen laten komen om haar macht te behouden. Bovendien hebben China, Iran en Rusland geen trek meer in de Petro Debt Dollar en werken aan een voorzichtige ontmanteling van de PetroDollar. Het probleem is dat er een Schuldenbom aan vast zit. Wanneer de PetroDollar van haar troon wordt gestoten zal dit ongekende, enorme gevolgen hebben voor ons financieel systeem in vooral het Westen. De VS zal er dan ook alles aan doen om de PetroDollar te behouden en daarmee het terrorisme en de oorlogsindustrie een verdere dienst bewijzen. Nogmaals de War on Terror en de PetroDollar voeden elkaar! ‘.

In geval van scenario 2 zal de ramp nog groter zijn. Soms wordt het wel een ‘Global reset’ genoemd. Ook daarover schreef (vertaalde) ik het volgende stuk (longread) Wordt 2017 het jaar van verandering of dendert de globalisering door? Veel van wat in dit stuk staat (het originele artikel dateert van mei 2014, vlak na de door de VS georkestreerde coup in Oekraïne) komt ook ter sprake in de documentaire. Uit dit stuk het volgende citaat:

‘Sinds de terreur aanslagen van 11 september 2001, tonen gebeurtenissen in de wereld, in het bijzonder in het Midden-Oosten, een groeiende onrust en instabiliteit tussen modern zionisme en de Arabische wereld. Dit is volledig in lijn met de oproep voor een Derde Wereldoorlog die wordt uitgevochten tussen die twee, en hun bondgenoten aan beide kanten. Deze Derde Wereldoorlog moet nog komen en de recente gebeurtenissen tonen ons dat het niet ver weg is.

Tijdlijn Derde Wereld Oorlog

Dit zijn, geloof ik, de fasen van de geplande Derde Wereldoorlog:

Inleiding – De gebeurtenissen in aanloop naar de start van de Derde Wereldoorlog, met inbegrip van 11 september 2001.
Act 1Het Midden-Oosten. Wijdverbreid conflict in de hele regio met als doel een vlammende oorlog, mogelijk veroorzaakt door Iran of militanten in Pakistan die gebruik maken van door Noord-Korea geleverde nucleaire wapens. De eerste scène in deze akte is de Amerikaanse invasie van Irak op 20 maart 2003.
Act 2Israël in oorlog – tegen haar Arabische buurlanden, misschien Palestina. Een Palestijnse staat zal worden opgericht, zodat alle Israëli’s volledig worden gescheiden van de Palestijnen (let op een vermelding van een 7-jarig verdrag dat wordt bevestigd door een wereldleider – waarschijnlijk Bush), met als enig doel kort daarna een venijnige aanval van Israël op Palestina.
Act 3Verre Oosten – ‘huiveringwekkende nucleaire confrontatie die het bestaan van de mensheid bedreigt’ – Peter Lemesurier, auteur van The Armageddon Script, p. 223, geschreven in 1981. Betreft het binnenvallen van Taiwan door China en een nucleaire uitbarsting op het Koreaanse schiereiland.
Act 4 Erosie van Vertrouwen in ‘Het Systeem’ zo ernstig dat burgers in paniek afstand zullen doen van hun vrijheden en de constitutionele vorm van de overheid. Het plan roept op tot de ontbinding van de Amerikaanse grondwet, getriggerd door een omvangrijke ‘terroristische’ aanval. De uiteindelijke bedoeling is om één wereldregering en één wereldreligie te introduceren.
Act 5De ineenstorting van de Verenigde Staten en andere westerse landen,  economisch en moreel.
Act 6Aanzienlijke vermindering van de bevolking met behulp van natuurlijke en door de mens veroorzaakte rampen.
Afloop. Wie kan vertellen hoe deze oorlog zal eindigen?

Zowel de Bijbelse profetie als de plannen van de Illuminatie stellen dat Israël de sleutel is. De start van de Derde Wereldoorlog is gepland op het moment dat Israël ten strijde trekt tegen haar Arabische vijanden. Dan, en alleen dan, zullen alle andere onderdelen optreden en elkaar in een rap tempo opvolgen. Het plan is om de ene ramp na de andere te laten ontstaan in een zodanig opeenvolgend tempo dat, voordat mensen mentaal en emotioneel met het rampzalige nieuws kunnen omgaan, ze al weer worden geraakt door een volgende ramp. Hierover nog de opmerking dat zolang ALLE onderdelen voor WW3 nog niet aanwezig zijn, de uitvoering van het plan niet zal worden gestart.

Hoewel het naïef zou zijn om een specifiek tijdschema te suggereren voor de gebeurtenissen die leiden tot en met de 3e Wereldoorlog, weten we dat de plannen voor die 3e Wereldoorlog in een vergevorderd stadium zijn en onze leiders, die betrokken zijn bij dit geheime plan, alleen wachten op het juiste signaal voor de totale oorlog begint’.

Welk scenario het wordt? Geen idee. Liever 1 dan 2. Dat het één van die twee wordt is voor mij nu vrijwel zeker. Maar is er dan geen ander, 3e scenario mogelijk? Uiteindelijk toch een succesvolle globalisering met als resultaat vrede, welzijn en welvaart voor iedereen? Kijkend naar onze ‘leiders’ en wat er gaande is geloof ik daar (Utopia) niet in. U wel?

Tot besluit toch nog even terug naar Robert van der Roer maar ook naar andere deskundigen, journalisten en politici. Wat weten zij wat wij niet weten of wat weten sommige van ons wat zij niet (lijken) te weten?

Om dat helder te krijgen, althans dat te proberen, hanteer ik de volgende 4 (beetje arbitraire, generaliserende) categorieën (wie de schoen denkt te passen……..):

  1. Mensen die het geen bal interesseert (de RTL en SBS brood en spelen kijkers).
  2. Mensen die de MSM volgen en geloven (de makkelijk door o.a. de NOS, RTL nieuws, Nieuwsuur, Buitenhof en NRC te beïnvloeden mensen).
  3. Mensen die kritisch zijn op de MSM, diverse alternatieve bronnen raadplegen, redelijk tot goed weten wat er werkelijk gaande is en zich verzetten tegen de plannen van de ‘elite’.
  4. Mensen die redelijk tot goed weten wat er gaande is maar die de waarheid bewust (gedwongen of ongedwongen) verborgen houden, mee blaten met de MSM of die juist sturen in hun berichtgeving. Ik noem ze ook wel trekpoppen van de ‘elite’.

Vaak is vrij makkelijk vast te stellen wie behoren tot de groepen 1, 2 of 3. Voor groep 4 vind ik dat wat lastiger. Wel zeker is, wat mij betreft, dat onze ‘leiders’ overduidelijk bij groep 4 horen. Welke schoen zou Robert van der Roer en sommige andere deskundigen passen? En als u kijkt naar sommige journalisten en politici? En naar uzelf?

We kunnen het Robert (en anderen) alsnog vragen, toch?


Foto May and Trump via telegraph.co.uk
Foto Theresa May via NewStatesMan.com



We gaan knallend het jaar uit

Schermkopie-2690 2017.12.29

Vanochtend zag ik onderstaande tweet van Jan Gajentaan.

Ik reageerde daarop met de volgende tweet.

Uri van As (van OpinieZ) is in zijn column vol lof over Trump. Grotendeels ben ik het met hem eens maar ik heb zo mijn twijfels over Trump en zijn ‘drain the swamp’. Eerder schreef ik ‘Donald Trump you’re full of shit‘. De basis van mijn twijfel is de weerzin van de elite en o.a. ‘onze’ politici (het partijkartel en de clan in Brussel) tegen Trump. Hij was/is niet hun gedroomde kandidaat (dat was Killary Clinton). Het feit dat ze van Trump af willen laat zien dat hij kennelijk ingaat tegen de agenda van de elite. Of is dat maar spel en is hij zoals elke Potus toch een trekpop van de elite? Mijn twijfel wordt verder gevoed door zijn buitenland beleid dat niet lijkt af te wijken van het beleid van zijn oorlogsmisdadige voorgangers George W. Bush en Barack Obama. Beleid van de Neocons en ander DeepState tuig.

En als Trump dan real is en really wants to drain the swamp, hoe en wanneer gaat hij dat dan echt doen? En nog belangrijker, kan hij dat doen?

In de video hierna The Swamp (lang maar het kijken waard). Ga die swamp maar eens drainen!!??

Dus, is het rotje van Uri echt knallend of moet de echte grote knallende vuurpijl nog komen? U weet het als u de docu ‘The Deep State – Who Rules America’ (en de rest van de wereld) heeft gezien. Ik heb er een hard hoofd in.

Maar……, wat er ook gebeurt, in ieder geval een knallende jaarwisseling (kijk uit) en A HAPPY NEW YEAR!!!



The real ‘leaders’ of the world, scum (English version)

Schermkopie-2434 2017.11.10

Dutch version here.

Last week a friend showed me two YouTube documentaries. The first and the longest one confirmed a lot of what I have discovered in recent years. Things that have totaly changed my worldview. In this documentary also new issues emerged. Things I didn’t know yet, that confirm and strengthen my view on the world. People who read other pieces of me and follow me on Twitter (and for a while now also on Gab) know approximately what my view is.

The second documentary, which is a lot shorter, gave me more or less (you can never be to sure) the answer to a question that I have been asking myself for a while, where stands Donald Trump?

Some time ago I wrote a piece about Trump ‘Donald Trump, you’re full of shit‘ (Dutch version here) in which I more or less described my disappointment in The Donald. Following his promise during his inauguration, I hoped for a change of US foreign policy. Nothing is less true, so I told Trump that via Twitter (I haven’t received an answer from him yet ;-).

The US, the elite’s war machine, under Donald Trump’s ‘leadership’, just won’t stop their false flag operations (is this one the latest?), regime changes and wars. So, Donald Trump seems to obey and continues with foreign policy as we already know from Obama and before him Bush.

My question is, why does the elite, supported by the MSM they control, still want to get rid of Donald Trump? I found a possible answer in the second documentary.

Tip for people who are a little sensitive to other insights (other than their worldview), first watch (over 2 hours) this “Must see documentary”. Please do, it explains a lot.

Did you watch it? OK, just settle down and then watch that second documentary. In the beginning, it is quite fierce, in the sense of ‘what kind of …… is this?’. But stick to it (I kept watching despite the monotonous conspiracy-like tone) then you’ll see what’s the role of Donald Trump and why he doesn’t fit into the elite’s plan.

It’s weekend, so enough time to find out how the elite decides about your future. Next step, how to translate that knowledge into action to reverse the dubious plans of the elite (if you’ve seen both docu’s you understand why I call the elite scum). When I was young, foolish, thus a leftist we had TBMHGR for action like that.

Have a good weekend!



The real ‘leaders’ of the world (scum)

Schermkopie-2434 2017.11.10

Afgelopen week tipte een kennis mij over twee YouTube documentaires. De eerste en tevens langste bevestigde veel van wat ik de afgelopen jaren zelf heb ontdekt. Zaken die mijn wereldbeeld totaal hebben veranderd. Ook kwamen er in deze documentaire nieuwe zaken naar voren. Zaken waarvan ik nog geen weet had en die mijn beeld van de wereld bevestigen en versterken. Wie andere stukken van mij heeft gelezen en wie mij volgt op Twitter (en sinds een tijdje ook op Gab) weet ongeveer wel hoe ik er over denk.

De tweede documentaire die een stuk korter is gaf me min of meer (zeker weten doe je het vrijwel nooit) antwoord op een vraag die mij al een tijdje bezig houdt, waar staat Donald Trump?

Al weer een tijdje terug schreef ik een stuk over Trump ‘Donald Trump, you’re full of shit‘ (engelse versie hier) waarin ik min of meer mijn teleurstelling in The Donald beschreef. Naar aanleiding van zijn belofte tijdens zijn inauguratie hoopte ik op verandering van de buitenlandse politiek van de VS. Niets is minder waar, dus ik liet Trump dat weten via Twitter (ik heb nog geen antwoord van hem gekregen ;-).

De VS, als oorlogsmachine van de elite, gaan, ook ‘onder leiding van’ Donald Trump, gewoon door met hun false flags (is dit er weer één?), regime changes en oorlogen. Donald Trump lijkt dus braaf te gehoorzamen en gaat ‘gewoon’ verder met de buitenlandse politiek zoals we die ook al onder Obama en eerder Bush kende.

Mijn vraag is dan ook, waarom wil de elite, met steun van de door hen gecontroleerde MSM, nog steeds van Donald Trump af? Een mogelijk antwoord vond ik in die 2e documentaire.

Tip voor mensen die een beetje gevoelig zijn voor andere inzichten (anders dan hun wereldbeeld), kijk eerst even (nou ja even, ruim 2 uren) naar deze ‘Must see documentary’. Doen, het verklaart veel, heel veel.

Gezien? Laat het even bezinken en ga dan door naar die tweede documentaire. Die is in het begin best wel heftig, in de zin van ‘wat is dit voor…….?’. Maar hou even vol (ik bleef kijken ondanks de monotone conspiracy achtige toon) dan ga je snappen wat de rol van Donald Trump is en waarom hij niet past in het plan van de elite.

Het is weekend dus tijd genoeg om je te verdiepen in hoe de elite beslist over jouw toekomst. Volgende stap, hoe die kennis te vertalen naar actie om de dubieuze plannen van die elite (als je beide docu’s hebt gezien snap je dat ik die elite ongedierte noem) te keren. Toen ik jong, dom en dus links was had we daarvoor DBMHGR.

Goed weekend!




Ook zo moe van de Twitter censuur?

Vandaag (of gisteren) is het account van @LisaHenegauwen alweer geschorst door Twitter. Ik ben benieuwd of dat weer voor kortere duur is.

DLxO0zaX4AIfN8d.jpg large

Mij is het ook een keer overkomen toen ik deze tweet plaatste.

Schermkopie-1728 2016.12.16

Toen dat gebeurde heb ik een account aangemaakt bij een concurrent van Twitter, GAB. Ik geef toe, GAB voelt minder gebruikersvriendelijk aan (qua software dan) dan Twitter. Dat komt denk ik voor een deel omdat ik het niet vaak gebruik. Maar GAB heeft ook voordelen, o.a. het aantal karakters (300) en de mogelijkheid om een bericht later nog aan te passen of te corrigeren (mocht een taal neuroot je op een foutje wijzen).

Wat lastig is, is dat je niet weet waarom iemand is geschorst en dat hij of zij geen tweets meer kan plaatsen. Zeker ingeval van Lisa is dat een gemis in mijn TL ;-).

Wat kunnen we daar aan doen? Ons in ieder geval niet laten onderwerpen aan de Twitter censuur. Ik heb een idee, een voorstel. Ik hoor wel (of niet) wat jullie er van vinden.

Maak een account aan op GAB. Handig is een look a like van je Twitter account, dan ben je makkelijk te vinden.
Wordt je door Twitter geschorst dan merken je volgers dat op Twitter en weten ze je te vinden op GAB.
Op GAB laat je zelf weten dat je geschorst bent op Twitter en wat je daar verder over kwijt wilt.
De persoon die geschorst is op Twitter kan op GAB worden gevolgd en berichten van hem of haar (ik doe niet aan gender neutraliteit) kunnen door anderen met een link (alleen via een web browser te verkrijgen, dus niet via de GAB App) worden gedeeld op Twitter. Hierna een voorbeeldje daarvan (tweet van mij):

Andersom kunnen ook berichten van Twitter via een URL worden gedeeld op GAB.
Zo houden we contact met elkaar en kunnen berichten toch worden gedeeld zolang de schorsing duurt.

En, misschien komt er wel een moment waarop we Twitter massaal de rug toe moeten keren. In dat geval vinden we elkaar op GAB.

Ben benieuwd of de tweet waarmee ik dit idee lanceer zal leiden tot mijn tweede schorsing. Wordt het erg stil aan mijn kant, dan weten jullie waar ik zit ;-).