Last week I read an excellent article (in Dutch) by Syp Wynia about the islamisation of the Netherlands entitled ‘Bend with the Muslims: how Islam changes the Netherlands’ (also to be found here).
An excellent article but not quite complete because the goal, the strategy to achieve that goal and the role of islam is missing. From a journalistic point of view probably not exeptable to speculate on that, but hey, I’m not a journalist, so I can do that and I’m going to do so here.
The opening sentence of the article states among others ‘Fact is that Islam is changing the Netherlands, a country always inclined to adapt’. I want to focus on the part ‘always inclined to adapt’. For years and still today the Dutch are called very tolerant people. In many ways this is true and let’s keep it that way. Over the years we became more free in our way of thinking and living. I know because just like Syp I was born in 1953 and grew up in the turbulent and wonderful sixties.
Syp writes about the beliefs of Muslims ‘Many beliefs that Muslims bring with them today differ not very much from what were prevailing views fifty years ago in the Netherlands’. This is very familiar to me, also because I am originally from a Christian family. The subjects mentioned by Syp were indeed taboo and weekly church attendance and Sundays(rest) were more or less sacred. During my high school experience I moved away from that.
Also I still remember the first guest workers who came to the Netherlands and how I met them on my first job. For years I have not been aware of islam. It played no role, it was not an issue, there were, it seemed (I’ve lived my whole life in a village), not many Muslims.
But somewhere it went wrong. Syp gives some reasons for that in his article. Among others, the increasing number of Muslims, an assertive younger Muslim generation and what he calls selfislamization, freely translated by me as hugging Muslims. The hugging (lots of examples here in Dutch) is mainly done by the Dutch government. Stating for years now that we are so tolerant. But is that really so? Or are we indoctrinated and did many of us take it for granted? And is that because of the reasons Syp mentioned, including naivete and guilt?
I think we have been manipulated for many years. At least you may expect intelligent politicians to make every effort to protect our rule of law. You don’t do that by importing a ‘religion’ which would love to abolish our rule of law today and replace it with Sharia law. When we see what is going on now, with a Muslim population of 6% (+ 1 million), you can guess what the future will bring. Our ‘don’t care about us’ number one politician Alexander Pechtold (fake democrats 66) even once stated that it would be no problem if democracy would disappear after a final democratic election (in that case, democracy literally as terror of the majority). That would be the ultimate example of selfislamization.
So assuming that ‘our’ politicians have enough common sense I dare say that we are being cheated. But why are they doing that, what’s behind it? Lately I’ve been looking into that a little bit more (as some of you might have noticed on Twitter).
It’s about islamization, what’s new, you’ll think? Well, islamization is not a coincidence, so no selfislamization because of naivete and guilt, but a particular choice.
A choice for Islam as a tool within a strategy to achieve a certain goal.
As I wrote in my column, ‘Nothing is coincidence, everything is planned and you can not change a thing about ‘(containing a reference to three presentations by Walter Veith), the goal is a new world order with one world government, one world religion and one world leader. In another presentation by Walter Veith ‘The UN & the occult calendar’ this is confirmed by several previously published statements by prominent people. Below is a small selection of sheets from Veith’s presentation with these statements.
One of the sheets states the following ‘There’s going to be CONFLICT, COERCION and CONSENSUS.
Which brings me to the strategy and the role of islam(ization) . As we can see, in many parts of the world islam causes (perhaps manipulated?) a lot of conflicts. With the import of islam (currently the ongoing flows of ‘refugees’), we inevitably import conflict into the European society (because not everyone is endlessly tolerant). The flow of ‘refugees’ is forced (coercion) upon us as you can see almost daily (the unrest and war in the Middle East and closer to home the mandatory refugee camps). Force like we also experience in the ‘unification’ of Europe. And there are many other examples. With this strategy chaos is deliberately created which eventually (with force, including eg curtailing freedoms) should lead to consensus, ‘peace and stability’ in a new world order only for those who (forced) want to cooperate. A new world order in a marxist (by the elite called neo-‘liberalism‘ or ‘social democracy‘) system containing a (relatively) small, self enriching elite and an oppressed, impoverished workingclass.
To complete, look at the presentations of Veith, at least to this one ‘The UN & the occult agenda’. Hopefully your disbelief about this new world order will disappear or your doubts will encourage you to further research, as I will continue to do.